The insurer American Shift request to require insurance for all
The industry’s new proposal in a discussion document was adopted unanimously today by the Board of Directors of the association, is incomplete. But the proposal, these four main elements:
* No specific tax incentives for employers and fiscal penalties for consumers, not to buy insurance, the Government will require all Americans to buy an essential package “of health. If the government will not suffice to achieve coverage in this way, then it may be necessary to require employers to contribute to the financing of such insurance coverage of the economy said. Most large companies already benefits for health personnel, but 30 million workers and members have no coverage.
* The government in defining the basic package of benefits. The package, even if not in detail, beyond the minimum would be the advantages and “most of the needs of Americans” for doctors services and hospital care. Private insurers would agree to the coverage by default, whatever the person’s medical history.
* The open-ended grant of State for health insurance would be reduced. If employers bought insurance, more than the package of basic benefits for their employees, premiums for additional coverage would be treated as income to workers, and would have to pay income tax. The kernel is still taxable benefits. According to the law, the employer has not proposed a health benefits should be taxed. Economists say tax breaks aimed about the use of costly health care through the promotion of enterprises to their employees overinsure.
* The government, with insurers and providers of facilities for the huge differences in payments to doctors and hospitals. Private insurers and support programs would ultimately pay similar amounts for the same services in the same geographical area. Medicare and Medicaid, programs for the poor and elderly, now typically pay less than private insurers.
Mr. Schramm said this recommendation is a major change, because it means that insurers are willing to play a greater role for the government to monitor prices of doctors and hospitals. “Shift costs
The Health Insurance Association, said that the lump-sum rate stabilization of health care and would prevent the government transfer of costs on patients with private insurance.
Insurers are keen to promote competition in the health care market, but recognize that decade, competition is not verhaltenes growth in the prices of health services, rising now twice as fast than other consumer prices. The association has decided, not on the proper balance between regulation and free competition on the market, a sensitive issues in each plan to reorganize health care.
The federal government has already established schedules for doctors’ and hospitals under Medicare, private insurers and some have begun to make similar price lists.
In January, President Bush seriously consider the imposition of a portion of health benefits to certain labor. But he abandoned the idea after Republicans members of Congress warned him that such a tax would lead to political turmoil on Capitol Hill. The commercial insurers now offers a similar proposal.
Dir of Colorado, Roy Romer, chairman of the National Governors’ Association, said Tuesday that the governors want the tax deductions that employers could the costs of providing health care benefits for workers. Currently, there is no limit to such deductions.
The new proposal describes the insurers’ Vision for the next ten years, was created by a committee of the Association of sickness funds from the direction of G. David Hurd, Chief Executive of the Principal Financial Group, in Des Moines. Mr. Clinton, M. Hurd, approved in September, indicating that the Democratic candidate “is a progressive mode of the national health reform” while maintaining an important role for private insurance.
The association began developing the new policy in February. The Board votes on straw in September, two months before the presidential elections.